Congressional Authority to Force the Purchase of a Commodity

To the Founding Fathers, politicians were an unavoidable, annoyance, due to sheer numbers and the growing American population. The Fathers kept authority in the people, who granted limited authority to politicians.

Congress does not possess the peoples' authority to pass laws decreasing peoples' protected Rights of private ownership of wealth (Income) under the present Constitution. Confiscation without authority is illegal seizure of private property (income) with the purpose of redistribution of wealth. ARTICLES [IV & [X].

The Constitution was written by the people, specifically limited Congress' authority as defined ARTICLE I section 8, to meet the Nation's business needs, without requesting new authority through Constitution Amendments, ARTICLE V.

Constitution ARTICLE I section 9, list specific prohibitions of Government power.

Any authority not specifically mentioned, is covered under ARTICLE [X], commonly referred to as the Bill of Rights. ARTICLE [X], which assigns unmentioned power and authority to the States and People.

Congress must petition the people for not named authority through proposed Constitutional Amendment. TWO-THIRDS of States Legislators must ratify (approve) the Amendment before it becomes part of the Constitution. ARTICLE V

Congress does not currently have the Peoples' Authority to require the people to purchases a specific commodity such as healthcare or insurance.

The PEOPLE, through the Constitution, did not authorize Congress to confiscate the Peoples' WEALTH as income, for the purpose of WEALTH REDISTRIBUTION, to enable strangers to purchase the forced purchase commodity.

Claiming non-contested past social bills as passive-authorization due to continued public silence is not a specific authorized power in the Constitution. The Supreme Court dealt with this PRINCIPLE in another venue.

Past unconstitutional laws remain as proof of unconstitutional laws.

The Supreme Court addressed documentation principle when it ruled that child pornography is not a Constitution protected right. Pictures are documents, evidence of crimes against minors with protected rights under the Declaration of Independence and Constitution.

Failure to prosecute over decades does not make past crimes legal or authorize additional criminally activities.

This situation addresses the elected protectors of the peoples' Constitution, violating both responsibility to protect peoples' Rights and elected politicians' obligation to support the existing Constitution, by living by the terms of a voluntary oath.

The Constitution does not specify documented and ignored government crimes, automatically convert into authorization of continued Constitution violations. It is no different in any criminal behavior that may benefit some, in one way or another.

A kidnapped person's ability to survive for 15-years as an enslaved victim does not make past or future abductions, legal, because the crime never came in front of a court.

Feeding abduction victims steak and lobster and providing clean sheets before and after each rape over several years, does not absolve the kidnapper of criminal behavior. The permitting newborn children to continue living is not a sign of decency.